Posted on

Ridgewood Mayor Gets Hammered Over Paperwork Campaign Finance Issues from 2016???

Ramon Hache ridgewood NJ

the staff of the Ridgewood blog

Ridgewood NJ, as many residents have already heard it is being reported that Ridgewood Mayor Ramon Hache did not correctly report or handle thousands of dollars he raised while running for a seat on the Ridgewood Village Council in 2016, New Jersey ‘s campaign finance watchdog alleged in a complaint. Yes thats 2016, when this story came up we thought well just like 2016 yuup same old same old.

Continue reading Ridgewood Mayor Gets Hammered Over Paperwork Campaign Finance Issues from 2016???
Posted on

Garrett , Boehner feud Spills into Campaign Finance

scott_garrett_seniors_theridgewoodblog

Scott Garrett defends handling of funds, won’t say if stance on gays played role

JULY 22, 2015, 11:24 PM    LAST UPDATED: WEDNESDAY, JULY 22, 2015, 11:29 PM
BY HERB JACKSON
WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENT |
THE RECORD

Rep. Scott Garrett broke a silence he’s maintained for nearly a week and said Wednesday that he is refusing to support the House Republicans’ main campaign fund because of a series of disagreements with the leadership of Speaker John Boehner.

Garrett, however, would not discuss a media report that he told colleagues one of his reasons for the dispute was that the campaign fund had supported gay candidates.

That report led to condemnation from Democrats and gay rights advocates, and criticism from a few Republicans aimed at Garrett, R-Wantage, one of the most conservative members of the House and chairman of a powerful subcommittee that regulates the finance industry.

At issue was campaign money, and whether Garrett, who had more than $2.2 million in his campaign account as of June 30, would be sharing some of what he raises with the party so it could elect Republican candidates. In part because of his subcommittee chairmanship, Garrett has raised nearly $1 million in each of the last two election cycles from people and committees tied to finance, insurance or real estate businesses.

Interviewed as he went from his office in the Rayburn Office Building to the House floor in the Capitol for a vote Wednesday night, Garrett said he had a history of voting against the party line.

Garrett, 56, now in his seventh term, mentioned his opposition to Boehner’s reelection as speaker in January and his opposition to an important rule in June that set up votes on a trade package that was a top priority of President Obama.

“You know how I voted for the speaker. You know how I voted on the rule. You know how I’ve not always supported leadership. You know that I don’t necessarily support all the things they do. So it’s somehow a surprise to you that I don’t necessarily support where they spend their money?” Garrett said.

http://www.northjersey.com/news/scott-garrett-defends-handling-of-funds-won-t-say-if-stance-on-gays-played-role-1.1378620

Posted on

8 Election Experts Slam IRS for Interfering with Campaign Finance

VOTE_theridgewoodblog.net_-300x22511

8 Election Experts Slam IRS for Interfering with Campaign Finance
Ken McIntyre
February 27, 2014 at 4:54 pm

Eight former members of the Federal Election Commission today accused the Internal Revenue Service of attempting to “interfere” with campaign finance regulations enacted by Congress, The Foundry has learned.

The former FEC commissioners signed a letter filed this afternoon as a public comment on the IRS’s proposed new rules on so-called “candidate-related political activity” by nonprofit advocacy organizations qualified as tax-exempt under federal law. Midnight is the deadline for public comment on the proposed rules, which critics say the IRS developed secretly and announced at Thanksgiving to silence some free speech – seven months after the IRS targeting scandal broke.

Signing the letter to the IRS were Lee Ann Elliott, Thomas J. Josefiak, David M. Mason, Don McGahn, Bradley A. Smith, Michael E. Toner, Hans A. von Spakovsky and Darryl Wold.  McGahn, the most recent member of the FEC, stepped down last year.

Among them, the former commissioners have 55 years of experience in campaign finance regulation, said von Spakovsky, a senior legal fellow at The Heritage Foundation who also manages the think tank’s Election Law Reform Initiative. He said:

“The proposed rules would severely restrict the First Amendment-protected political activity of nonprofit advocacy organizations. It seems obvious that this is the second stage in the Obama Administration’s attempt to silence its critics – first they targeted Tea Party and other conservative organizations to delay their IRS applications for tax-exempt status, and now they are changing the rules to make it almost impossible for them to operate.”

Americans may register their comments with the IRS through the website NonProfitFreedom.org – a project of the Center for Competitive Politics in Alexandria, Va., which Smith heads.

Smith, FEC chairman from 2000 to 2005, told The Foundry:

”The IRS needs to recognize the dangers of embroiling itself in the political process.  It just is not equipped to regulate in an area far removed from revenue collection, and that Congress specifically entrusted to the bipartisan Federal Election Commission.  If the proposed rules are any indication, the agency is already far out of its depth.”

The proposed changes would affect Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code, which covers nonprofit groups ranging from the Sierra Club on the left to the National Rifle Association on the right. In their letter, Smith, von Spakovsky and the six other former FEC members argue that the IRS lacks the statutory authority to restrict the political activity of such organizations and that the proposed rules do not “respect Supreme Court precedent.”

The commissioners also say the proposed rules would “confuse regulated entities” and “seriously undermine the First Amendment rights and protections of the Constitution.”  They point out the “inappropriateness” of the IRS’s proposing “a regulatory scheme almost identical to a provision of federal campaign finance law that the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional”  in the Citizens United decision.

The IRS’s actions are “arbitrary and capricious,” they conclude, and the proposed rules “should be withdrawn.”

Midnight is the deadline for public comments on the “Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.”  As of earlier today, almost 100,000 comments had been filed, indicating that the response may break a record for the IRS.

Von Spakovsky said a quick review of the comments indicates that the public tide is running strongly against the IRS on the rules.

Some in Congress also have criticized the rules change –Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY), House Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), and other congressional leaders sent a letter of protest Feb. 5 to the IRS.  They wrote that the rules “target the First Amendment rights” of grassroots groups and appear “calculated to take effect just in time for the mid-term elections.”

By a 243-176 vote, the House on Wednesday approved a bill that would delay the rules for a year. , Senate Democrats are expected to prevent the bill, sponsored by House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-MI), from coming to a vote.  The White House has threatened a veto.

This story was produced by The Foundry’s news team. Nothing here should be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation.

http://blog.heritage.org/2014/02/27/foundry-exclusive-8-election-experts-slam-irs-interfering-campaign-finance/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social